Global aspects
Illustrative quote
"The recent expansion of international trade
agreements to include intellectual property rights threatens the sustainability
of local ecosystems, the rights of indigenous peoples, the ability of nations
to provide food security, and protection of the global environment."
The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
___________________________________
Contents
Introduction "at a glance"
Globalization of Biotechnological Agriculture
and the world hunger problem
Third World reactions to globalization attempts
Patenting of life paves the way for
global application biotechnology
Introduction
The strongest argument to make governments accept Genetically
Engneered food has been that it will provide crops that increase food production.
This appears to be a scientifically unsubstantiated myth. A recent scientific
report even shows that world hunger is not at all due to food scarcity
but is caused by increasing poverty in developing countries (see World hunger - a myth).
In addition it has not yet been proven that any really valuable crop that
would increase food productivity can be developed with gene technology
(see article on difficulites with GE)
On the contrary African scientists
think "it will destroy the diversity, the local knowledge and the
sustainable agricultural systems that our farmers have developed for millennia
and that it will thus undermine our capacity to feed ourselves."
In addition, global agriculture based on biotechnology
is expected to cause important socioeconomic changes wich increased poverty
as such farming requires good finances. Thereby and by destroying traditions
of sustainable agriculture, it might even lead to increased world hunger
(see the Vancouver statement).
Globalization of Biotechnological
Agriculture and the world hunger problem
The
Vancouver Statement On the Globalization
and Industrialization of Agriculture
Excerpt: "Reducing farming to a monocultural, synthetic, transnational
corporate business threatens the health, nourishment, right livelihood,
and spirituality of communities and the earth. It is insane to believe
that we must poison land and water and waste the soil in order to feed
and clothe ourselves. Five decades of the so-called Green Revolution have
not only led to the destruction and contamination of water, soil, biodiversity,
and human communities, but exacerbated hunger worldwide"
It
is a myth that world hunger is due to scarcity of food Increased
food production is not the solution according to Peter Rosset, director
of the Institute for Food and Development Policy in California.
Haven't We Been Here Before? The Green Revolution (5 kB). (Cornerhouse). The green revolution was the breakthrough for industrial agriculture in the Third World. Although it undoubtedly increased food production, it singularly failed to address the problem of world hunger. This is part of the next paper on this list.
Food? Health? Hope?: Genetic Engineering and World Hunger (NOTE: 213 kB). Cornerhouse Briefing. Very comprehensive and informative. Addresses the problems with industrial agriculture including biotechnology from a broad perspective with special reference to world hunger.
Can
genetic engineering produce crops that increase food production?
Due to limitations in the technology it is not possible to insert multiple
genes which would be required in order to promote increased food productivity.
There are no indications that successful such manipulations will be possible
in the foreseeable future.
Third World reactions to globalization
attempts
New! (Nov.
1998) Indians
resists genetically engineered crops A
nationwide network of Indian groups demands a ban on all genetic engineering
trials, a change of the Biosafety regulations to ensure people's participation
in decisions about genetic engineering and a five year moratorium on all
commercial releases and total ban on import of genetic engineered foods
and crops .
(Aug. 1998 ) African
Scientists Condemn Monsanto Latest Tactics and Call for European Support
"We do not believe that such companies or gene
technologies will help our farmers to produce the food that is needed in
the 21st century. On the contrary, we think it will destroy the diversity,
the local knowledge and the sustainable agricultural systems that our farmers
have developed for millennia and that it will thus undermine our capacity
to feed ourselves."
Biotechnology
from a third world perspective, by dr Vandana Shiva
Terminator Technology - a potential threat to third world agriculture
Concerns about the impact the terminator will have on poor farmers have led the United Nations-funded Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research to recommend that its sixteen member institutes ban the technology in their crop improvement research programs.
- New! Terminator genes at large. Covertly, crops using the the highly problematic terminator technology have been released in the US and UK. These crops pose important risks in addition to those of non-terminator GE crops.
- Terminator Technology [EL] An introduction.
-
How the Terminator terminates. [ML]
An explanation for the non-scientist of a remarkable patent for killing second generation seeds of crop plants. Includes a discussion of potential hazards.
Patenting of life paves the way
for global application biotechnology
Problems with the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
agreements
The IPR agreements are international agreements that deal
mainly with the right to patent living organisms, which causes many problematic
complications.
Consequences
of the EU patent directive. Comprehensive
information by the GAIA foundation that gives an idea of the problems following
from patenting of life based on the IPR agreements.
New! IPR
from a Third World perspective An article
by Dr Vandana Shiva
The links below have been copied from "Introduction
and index to Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) info sheets" from the Institute for Agriculture
and Trade Policy" and contains selected links to materials at that
website.
1. The
Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Biodiversity
by Kristin Dawkins, Michelle Thom and Carolyn Carr
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
To receive a copy send email to: ipr-info1@iatp.org
3. Pirates
of Diversity: The Global Threat to the Earth's Seeds
by Karen Lehman, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy(July
1994)
To receive a copy send email to: ipr-info3@iatp.org
7. Patenting
Of Life and Its Implications For Indigenous Peoples
by Debra Harry, Northern Paiute Nation, Nevada(January 1995)
To receive a copy send email to: ipr-info7@iatp.org
9. Releases
of Genetically Engineered Plants and Their Impacts on Less Developed Countries
Isabelle Meister and Dr. Sue Mayer, Greenpeace International(April
1995)
To receive a copy send email to: ipr-info9@iatp.org
13. Patent
Nonsense: On the Patenting of Life
by Dr. Phil Bereano, Council for Responsible Genetics Washington
Biotechnology Action Council
To receive a copy send email to: ipr-info13@iatp.org
14. Towards
A Biosafety Protocol
by Kristin Dawkins, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
To receive a copy send email to: ipr-info14@iatp.org
"Genetically Engineered Food - Safety
Problems"
Published by PSRAST
Siteguide Starting points Website search Site Map Start page
News Introductory articles Health hazards Environmental hazards
Global issues Safety issues Alternatives to GE FAQ
About us What You can do Membership E-mail How to sponsor us
|