GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOOD-A SERIOUS HEALTH RISK
Genetically engineered foods containing genes derived from bacteria
and viruses are now starting to appear in the shops, and foods with insect,
fish, and animal genes will soon follow. These genetic changes are radically
different from those resulting from traditional methods of breeding. Yet,
the sale of these foods is being permitted without proper assessment of
the risks and without adequately informing the public, even though many
scientists say that genetically modified foods could cause serious damage
to health and the environment.
WHAT IS GENETIC ENGINEERING?
Genes are the blueprints for every part of an organism. Genetic engineering
is the process of articficially modifying these blueprints. By cutting
and splicing DNA-genetic surgury-genetic engineers can transfer genes specific
to one type of organism into any other organism on earth.
WHY DO IT?
Scientists want to transfer desirable qualities from one organism to another,
for example, to make a crop resistant to an herbicide or to enhance food
value.
IS IT NECESSARY?
At first sight it may seem appealing. However, closer examination reveals
that commercial and political motives are taking precedence with little
regard to the possible dangers. We already have the ability to feed the
world's population without the risks posed by genetic engineering. Why
subject humanity to these unnecessary risks?
WHAT ARE THE DANGERS? (Please see more detailed
discussion below.)
Those identified so far include:
- New toxins and allergens in foods
- Other damaging effects on health caused by unnatural foods
- Increased use of chemicals on crops, resulting in increased contamination
of our water supply and food
- The creation of herbicide-resistant weeds
- The spread of diseases across species barriers
- Loss of bio-diversity in crops
- The disturbance of ecological balance
- Artificially induced characteristics and inevitable side-effects will
be passed on to all subsequent generations and to other related organisms.
Once released, they can never be recalled or contained. The consequences
of this are incalculable.
WHAT IS THE SITUATION NOW?
Genetically modified foods available, or about to appear, in U.S. markets
include tomatoes, squash, yeast, corn, potatoes, and soybeans (which are
used in 60 % of all processed foods, such as bread, pasta, candies, ice
cream, pies, biscuits, margarine, meat products and vegetarian meat substitutes).
Genetically modified organisms are also used to produce cheeses and canola
oil. But this is just the beginning. In a few years it may be almost impossible
to find natural food.
The food industry and government appear to be complacent. They assume that
these new foods are not substantially different from existing foods and
pose no special risks. But this assumption is wrong and dangerous. The
radical changes being made by biotechnologists could never happen in nature,
and have already caused toxic side-effects. Current regulations require
only minimal safety testing for some foods, and none at all for others.
In no case do regulations require evaluation of long term impacts on health.
Most genetically modified foods will not be labelled. Under present regulations
manufacturers are already introducing genetically modified ingredients
into many processed foods without informing consumers. The government is
ignoring the wishes of the public. Surveys consistently find that 85-90%
of consumers want clear labelling of all genetically engineered foods.
DESPITE INTENDED BENEFITS, MANY TECHNOLOGIES PRODUCE DISASTROUS SIDE-EFFECTS.
Increasingly, society is recognizing side-effects such as nuclear pollution,
global warming, and the toxic effects of pesticides and herbicides. Medicines
are often withdrawn because the side-effects turn out to be too poisonous.
In every case, it has taken time for hazards to come to light and for action
to be taken.
Genetic engineering poses the greatest danger of any technology yet introduced.
Because many of the damageing effects of genetic engineering are irreversible,
we must prevent problems before they occur. The precautionary approach
is essential if we are to protect ourselves, our children, and all generations
to come. We must take action now, if we want to prevent an avalanche of
genetically engineered foods from inundating the market and placing virtually
everyone at risk.
WE MUST ACT BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
Genetically engineered foods are being introduced without due regard for
health, yet many damaging effects will be irreversible.
What is needed
TO PROTECT OUR HEALTH:
- Any food produced through genetic engineering should be banned until
scientifically shown to be safe and safe for everyone.
- In the meantime, labeling should be required for any food that contains
even one genetically engineered ingredient, or that has been produced using
genetically modified organisms or enzymes.
- Full disclosure labelling will allow consumers to choose what they
eat. It will also help scientists trace the source of health problems arising
from these foods.
TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT:
- All applications of genetic engineering should be banned that carry
the risk of accidental or intentional release of genetically modified organisms
into the environment.
What you can do
- Write to members of Congress, food producers, supermarkets, the press
and consumer groups, expressing your concern and enclosing this leaflet.
- Make copies of this document for friends, family, colleagues, students,
trades unions, clubs and societies. Alert everyone to the dangers.
DANGERS OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOODS
The scientific facts demonstrating the need for an immediate worldwide
ban
Because living organisms are highly complex, genetic engineers cannot possibly
predict all of the effects of introducing new genes into them. This is
the case for even the simplest bacterium, not to mention more complex plants
and animals.
THIS IS BECAUSE:
- the introduced gene may act differently when working within its new
host
- the original genetic intelligence of the host will be disrupted
- the new combination of the host genes and the introduced gene will
have unpredictable effects; and therefore
- there is no way of knowing the overall, long-term effect of genetically
engineered foods on the health of those who eat them.
THE FOLLOWING ARE SOME OF THE FACTS:
- Unnatural gene transfers from one species to another are dangerous.
Biotechnology companies erroneously claim that their manipulations are
similar to natural genetic changes or traditional breeding techniques.
However, the cross-species transfers being made, such as between fish and
tomatoes, or between other unrelated species, would not happen in nature
and may create new toxins, diseases, and weaknesses. In this risky experiment,
the general public is the guinea-pig.
- Biotechnology companies also claim their methods are precise and
sophisticated.
In fact, the process of inserting genes is quite random and can damage
normal genes. Genetic research shows that many weaknesses in plants, animals,
and humans have their origin in tiny imperfections in the genetic code.
Therefore, the random damage resulting from gene insertion will inevitably
result in side-effects and accidents. Scientists have assessed these risks
to be substantial. (Refs: Palmiter, R.D. et al (1986) ANNUAL REVIEW OF
GENETICS 20: 465; Inose, T. et al (1995) INT. JOUR. FOOD SCIENCE TECH.
30:141.)
- Unpredictable health damaging effects.
When genetic engineers insert a new gene into any organism there are
"position effects" which can lead to unpredictable changes in
the pattern of gene expression and genetic function. The protein product
of the inserted gene may carry out unexpected reactions and produce potentially
toxic products. There is also serious concern about the dangers of using
genetically engineered viruses as delivery vehicles (vectors) in the generation
of transgenic plants and animals. This could destabilise the genome, and
also possibly create new viruses, and thus dangerous new diseases. (Refs:
Green, A.E. et al (1994) SCIENCE 263:1423; Osbourn, J.K. et al (1990) VIROLOGY
179:921.)
- Genetically engineered products carry more risks than traditional
foods.
The process of genetic engineering can thus introduce dangerous new
allergens and toxins into foods that were previously naturally safe. Already,
one genetically engineered soybean was found to cause serious allergic
reactions, and bacteria genetically engineered to produce large amounts
of the food supplement, tryptophan, have been
suspected to produce toxic contaminants that killed 37 people and permanently
disabled 1,500 more (although conclusive proof have not been possible to
produce because the bacteria were never analysed(editors comment)). (Refs:
Nordlee, J.A. et al (1996) THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 688; Mayeno,
A.N. et al (1994) TIBTECH 12:364.)
- Increased pollution of food and water supply.
More than 50% of the crops developed by biotechnology companies have been
engineered to be resistant to herbicides. Use of herbicide-resistant crops
will lead to a threefold increase in the use of herbicides, resulting in
even greater pollution of our food and water with toxic agrochemicals.
(Ref: Goldberg, R.J. (1994) WEED TECHNOLOGY 6:647.)
- Health-damaging effects caused by genetic engineering will continue
forever.
Unlike chemical or nuclear contamination, genetic pollution is self-perpetuating.
It can never be reversed or cleaned up; genetic mistakes will be passed
on to all future generations of a species.
- Inadequate government regulation.
Biotech companies claim that government regulatory bodies will protect
consumers. However DDT, Thalidomide, L-tryptophan, etc. were approved by
U.S. regulators with tragic results. Recently it was found that 80% of
supermarket milk contained traces of either medicines, illegal antibiotics
used on farms, or hormones, including genetically engineered bovine growth
hormone (rbGH). The facts show that regulators are not protecting the public
adequately. (Ref: Epstein, S.S. (1996) INT. JOUR. HEALTH SERVICES, 26:173.)
- Ethical concerns.
Transferring animal genes into plants raises important ethical issues
for vegetarians and religious groups. It may also involve animal experiments
which are unacceptable to many people.
- Gene transfer across species and competition
from new species damaging the environment.
When new genetic information is introduced into plants, bacteria, insects
or other animals, it can easily be passed into related organisms, through
processes such as cross pollination. This process has already created "super
weeds". Existing species can also be displaced from the ecosystem
with disastrous effects, as happened with genetically modified Klebsiella
soil bacteria. (Ref: Holms, M.T. and Ingam, E.R. (1994) Bulletin of the
Ecological Society of America (Supplement), 75:97)
- Crops are now being engineered to produce their own pesticides.
This will promote the more rapid appearance of resistant insects and
lead to excessive destruction of useful insects and soil organisms, thus
seriously perturbing the ecosystem. In addition, the pesticide produced
by the plant may be harmful to the health of consumers. (Refs: Union of
Concerned Scientists (1994) GENE EXCHANGE, 5:68; Mikkelsen, T.R. et al
(1996) Nature 380:31; Skogsmyr, I. (1994) THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
88:770; Hama, H. et al (1992) APPLIED ENTYMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY 27:355.)
GLOBAL THREAT TO HUMANITY'S FOOD SUPPLY
Giant transnational companies are carrying out a dangerous global experiment
by attempting to introduce large numbers of genetically engineered foods
widely into our food supply. Because genetic manipulations can generate
unanticipated harmful side-effects, and because genetically engineered
foods are not tested sufficiently to eliminate those that are dangerous,
this experiment, not only jeopardizes the health of individuals, but could
also lead to national or even global food shortages and large-scale health
threats.
There is no logical scientific justification for exposing society to this
risk, nor is it necessary to take this risk for the purpose of feeding
humanity. It is only of benefit to the biotech industry, which will obtain
short term commercial gains at the expense of the health and safety of
the whole population. Tampering with the genetic code of food is reckless
and poses a serious threat to life. It could easily upset the delicate
balance between our physiology and the foods that we eat. There is already
ample scientific justification for an immediate ban on genetically modified
foods in order to safeguard our health.
CAMPAIGN TO BAN GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOOD
For further information or to offer your support for this campaign, please
contact jfagan@mum.edu
Also, for further information and solutions read:
THE HAZARDS, VEDIC ENGINEERING: THE SOLUTIONS by John Fagan Ph.D.
- an award-winning geneticist who returned his government grants and began new research in Maharishi's Vedic Science.
John B. Fagan, Ph.D.
Professor of Molecular Biology
Maharishi University of Management
(Maharishi International University 1971 to 1995)
1000 North Fourth Street
Fairfield, Iowa, 52557-1078
Phone(515) 472-8342
Fax (515) 472-5725
email jfagan@mum.edu
"Genetically Engineered Food - Safety Problems"
Published by PSRAST
Siteguide Starting points Website search Site Map Start page
News Introductory articles Health hazards Environmental hazards
Global issues Safety issues Alternatives to GE FAQ
About us What You can do Membership E-mail How to sponsor us