Highly suspect industrial resultsFor the brain tumor, meningioma, a striking difference was found between industry funded research (red triangles) and independent studies (blue squares). The most absurd result was an industry study indicating 186% reduction of the risk (the red tringle at the point of the arrow at the left side). While almost no industry funded study found any hazards, all independent studies reported increased risk, though it was not statistically significant in all cases (the more significant the higher up in the graph). See also our conclusion below the graph.
Source: "Industry bias". ConclusionThis confirms what common sense says. We cannot trust industry funded reserach because it produced scienctists who are dependent on a party that has huge economic interests in suppressing the real truth about the hazards of mobile phones. The main purpose of this pseudoreserach is to confound political decisionmakers as well as the general public in order to create the false impression that different scientists have arrived at opposite conclusions regarding the safety of cell phones. The truth is that independent scientist have found strong reasons to believe that mobile phones are hazardous while corrupt industry depenendent scientists have an opinion that is not worth the paper it is printed on. |