Step three

Site Guide

This guide will help you, step by step, to arrive at an understanding of the various aspects of this issue.

There is a link to this page at the bottom of every page at this site.


Difficulty level of link:   [EL] = elementary.   [ML] = medium.   [AL] = advanced.


Contents

  1. Basics
  2. Understanding the environmental issue
  3. Understanding the food safety issue
  4. Some good articles
  5. Still skeptical?
  6. How could it happen that GE foods were approved?
  7. Agricultural problems
  8. Global Aspects
  9. Increasing resistance worldwide
  10. Alternatives to genetic engineering of food
  11. News



1. Basics

Understanding genetic engineering

If you have forgotten most of what you learnt about biology it is good to read some very simple introductory texts that everybody can understand:

  • A first introduction. Gives a brief, comprehensive picture that summarizes the essential points of the whole story.

  • What is genetic engineering?  [EL] A brief and simple explanation of genes and genetic engineering.


    When you have read the above article, you will understand the article:

  • How are genes engineered" [ML].



    General overview

    To get a general idea of the problems with GE foods, it is good, yes we would say important, to read: Summary of the key points about safety".




    Insufficient knowledge of DNA

    It is important to understand that science knows far too little about DNA to be able to master genetic engineering. A simple introduction is:

  • Is our knowledge sufficient for safe use of biotechnology? [EL]


    Another good and fairly simple article explaining more about this is:

  • Incomplete knowledge about DNA  [ML]

    It is a condensate of a more advanced article:

  • Does science have enough knowledge about DNA to be able to predict and master the effects of genetic engineering? [ML] 


    Genetic engineering is based on the "one gene - one property" theory. However this is an outdated conception. This explained in:

  • The new understanding of genes  [ML]

    A more advanced article on the same issue was written by professor Richard Strohman at the University of Berkeley:

  • Toward a new paradigm for life - Beyond genetic determinism  [ML], partly  [AL]. A fresh very interesting explanation of the present status of the understanding of genetic regulation and a comment on the results of the Human Genome Project.


    2. Understanding the environmental issue

    Ecologists (environment researchers) have warned for a number of possible complications that may disrupt the ecology and cause agricultural problems. We want to point to a few here that seem especially problematic:

    The perhaps most worrisome is that GE plants may give rise to new and harmful viruses. This complication has been experimentally demonstrated and cannot be dismissed as conjectural. This is explained in:

  • The Virus Hazard   [EL]

  • Another complication that may be very problematic is if genes from GE crops would harm the ecology of soil micro-organisms. This might lead to irreparable damage to soil fertility. This is a yet unproven hypothesis with some indirect support. For more see:

  • Genetically Engineered Crops - a Threat to Soil Fertility?  [EL].


    Although scientists have warned for various complications of GE crops, scientific investigation of them has been very scarce and incomplete, see:

  • "Is there sufficient knowledge about environmental effects to justify release of GE organisms?" [ML] ( almost  [EL] ). This is a Key document.


  • For more see the section: Environmental hazards.



    3. Understanding the food safety issue

    These articles explain in a simple way why genetically engineered foods may be hazardous:

  • What may happen in the worst case: The tryptophan disaster that killed 39 and caused severe suffering in 1500 people.
  • The articles above are based on the following scientific key documents:

  • Scientific key document 1: The Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods. Reasons to expect hazards and the risk for their appearance. [ML] 




  • 4. Some good articles

    These articles cover different aspects of the issue:



    5. Still skeptical?

    If you still believe that it is justified to release GE organims into nature and that GE foods are safe, you have, like many others, probably been exposed to the very skilfull propaganda campaign of the biotech industry. It has lasted for several years. Leading PR companies, experts on manipulating peoples attitudes have done the very best to brainwash people to believe that GE foods are a boon to mankind, the pinnacle of scientific progress.

    This article explains how this brainwashing works:

  • PR strategies used to manipulate opinions about GE foods.  [EL]


    If you find the arguments of biotech proponents impressive, we suggest you take a "brain wash antidote" by reading:

  • "Misleading arguments commonly used by biotech advocates" [EL]


    The "heaviest" argument used to confuse people is that genetic engineering provides foods of great value. There is in fact no single GE food that is of significant value, see:

  • "Do genetically engineered foods provide any benefits?" [EL]


    6. How could it happen that GE foods were released in spite of insufficient knowledge?

    As you now begin to realize GE organsims should neither have been released into nature nor sold as food, you may be surprised that they still have been approved (we were stunned when it occurred 6-7 years ago).

    Our understanding of what happened is presented in this article which serves as a general introduction:

  • Why were genetically engineered foods approved in spite of insuffient safety data?  [EL]


    This article adds some illuminating background facts:

  • How It Happened That We Don't Regulate Biotech  [EL] by professor Donella Meadows. A revealing article about scientists systematicaly hiding the truth and lying about important discoveries of hazards due to genetic engineering. This paved the way for approval of genetic engineering without any demands on stringent safety evaluation.


    Revealing is how the American Food agency, FDA suppressed warnings about GE foods among its own experts:

  • FDA records support the lawsuit challenging its policy (June 1999)   [EL]   FDA records delivered to the court reveal the agency declared genetically engineered foods to be safe in the face of disagreement from its own experts--all the while claiming a broad scientific consensus supported its stance. The approval by FDA, on faulty grounds paved the way for international acceptance of a flawed procedure of approving GE foods (se below).

  • The present avalanche of GE foods on the market was made possible through the use of a principle (Substantial Equivalence) for food approval without scientific basis. This principle was endorsed by international and national expert committees and regulatory agencies including the UN organ FAO. The consequence is that no food on the market has been appropriately tested. This is a serious failure of international regulatory procedures. Here this principle is explained:

  • Inadequate safety assessment of GE foods.  [EL] Important for understanding this issue..


    The dependence of scientists upon industrial support in this field has contributed importantly to this situation. This is explained further in:

  • Dysfunctional science - Towards a "pseudoscientfic world order"?  [EL]


  • For more see the section: "Safety issues". It contains more articles revealing astonishing lenience towards industrial interests, if not apparently corrupt behaviour, of regulatory agencies especially in the US but also in other countries as well as in international bodies like the UN. We suggest you read the Summary and then continue to the first section, which is "Inadequate functioning of governmental bodies"


    7. Agricultural problems

    The great expectations that the biotech proponents created have not been fulfilled. There has not been increased yields, rather the opposite. It has not been possible to reduce the use of toxic chemicals, rather the opposite. Increasing numbers of farmers, even in the "mainland of GE", United States, are turning away from GE crops. The problem reports are many. Here are a few articles:



    8. Global aspects



    9. Increasing resistance world-wide

    During 1999 there was a turning point. Until then the biotech corporations were optimistic and expressed great expectations. But during that year a number of setbacks occurred, including a great increase of consumer protests in many countries. Governments in of several countries turned more and more restrictive if not banning the crops altogether.

  • Problems and Obstacles in Food Biotechnology. This article contains brief news lines illustrating the development during 1999.
  • Regions banning some or all GE crops from their territory. [EL] The number of regions all over the world banning GE crops is increasing steadily.

    10. Alternatives to genetic engineering of food

    1. Sustainable agriculture

    Research on organic farming indicates that it can give as good or better yield as industrial farming without using any harmful chemicals. See for example:

    • Organic Farming Will Feed the World.  Astonishingly, some reports indicate that it's more productive than industrial "Hi-Tech" agriculture. This is a major blow to the main argument for genetic engineering of crops. By Mr. George Monbiot.


    A recent FAO report has shown that genetic engineering is not necessary to feed the world:



    2. Genomics

    This technology used the knowledge about genes developed in biotechnology for finding suitable breeding partners. This approach is expected to speed up the pace of conventional breeding greatly. Leading experts, even in biotech companies consider this a more realistic and more effective alternative for improving crops than genetic engineering.


    For more, see the section:

  • Alternatives to genetic engineering of food


    11. News

    Here is a link to our: News page. Presenting some important news in recent years.


    12. Help us increase the awareness about the hazards all over the world.

    Make a donation - even a few dollars are well spent

    Even a few dollars are worth-while to donate, because of the large number of visitors - 312.000 people during 2006 - and the money will have a world-wide impact, because we have visitors from over 160 countries.

    By donating you enable us to continue to entertain and improve the website and to expand our activity.

    Just click on the PayPal button below. From the page that opens, you can very easily create a free PayPal account unless you have one already. Just enter what you want to donate, and then click on "continue checkout" and you will be automatically transferred to PayPal membership registration, which is completely free and takes only a couple of minutes.


    Conclusion

    Now we hope it is more obvious to you why we find it necessary to forbid the release of GE organisms (plants, trees, fishes, insects, bacteria etc) into the environment and ban the use of GE foods. You may want to review our major conclusions in Step Two .


    To step four


    in

    "Genetically Engineered Food - Safety Problems"
    Published by PSRAST

    Siteguide   Starting points   Website search   Site Map   Start page   

    News   Introductory articles   Health hazards   Environmental hazards   

    Global issues   Safety issues   Alternatives to GE   FAQ   

    About us   What You can do   Membership   E-mail   How to sponsor us